free design system resources | Mantlr

<!--

IMAGE: HERO (cover image, 1600×900)

RENDER: A 16:9 dark-mode collage showing 8 design system logos arranged in a 4×2 grid on a #0E0F11 background. Logos: shadcn/ui, Radix UI, Material Design 3, IBM Carbon, Shopify Polaris, Atlassian Design System, Fluent 2, Ant Design. Each logo in its brand color but desaturated to maintain visual coherence. Thin 1px #1F2024 borders between tiles. Bottom-left: small label "Free resources — 2026" in mid-grey.

ALTERNATIVE: A layered visual showing the three layers of a design system stacked vertically (Tokens → Components → Documentation), with example logos in each layer (W3C DTCG + Style Dictionary in Tokens; shadcn/ui + Radix in Components; Storybook + zeroheight in Documentation).

FILE: /images/blog/free-design-system-resources-2026-hero.png

ALT TEXT: "Free design system resources every team needs in 2026 — shadcn/ui, Radix UI, Material Design 3, IBM Carbon, Polaris, Atlassian, Fluent 2, and Ant Design"

-->

You are either building your first design system from scratch, inheriting one that nobody documented, or you have been told the team needs "a design system" and you are now responsible for figuring out what that means. The internet is full of "10 best design systems" listicles that show you Material Design and IBM Carbon and tell you to be inspired. None of them answer the actual question: what do you do on Monday morning when you have to start building one?

This guide is that answer. The free design system resources you actually need in 2026, organized by what each one does for your team. Not 20 famous systems to admire. The component libraries, token tools, documentation platforms, and reference systems that working teams use to ship real products without paying for a vendor or hiring a design ops manager.

A note on what changed in 2025-2026 that makes this list different from anything published earlier. shadcn/ui became the dominant component library for new React projects, with 70% adoption growth in 2025 according to multiple developer surveys. Penpot launched native design tokens with full DTCG (Design Tokens Community Group) support in early 2026, eliminating the need for a paid Figma plugin. Radix UI, which powers shadcn/ui, announced it was no longer being actively maintained in mid-2025, pushing teams toward alternatives like Base UI and React Aria. zeroheight added free tier expansion in 2026 for documentation. The free-tier design system stack in 2026 is genuinely better than the paid stack was two years ago.

Skip to the comparison table for the short version. Read on for the reasoning behind each pick.

All the design systems and component libraries in this guide are curated on Mantlr — with framework support, license details, and direct links to documentation.

Browse Design System Resources on Mantlr →

When you actually need a design system

Before the list, the question nobody asks: do you need a design system, or do you need a component library? They are not the same.

A component library is a set of reusable UI pieces (buttons, forms, modals, cards). You install it and use it. Most small teams need this and not more.

A design system is a component library plus design tokens, plus usage guidelines, plus governance rules, plus documentation, plus a contribution model. It is organizational infrastructure for multiple products and teams to ship consistent work.

Rough rule of thumb: if you have one product and fewer than 5 designers, you need a component library. If you have multiple products, more than 10 designers, or you cross teams that ship independently, you need a design system. Most of the "I should build a design system" energy in startups is actually "I should adopt a free component library and stop reinventing buttons every sprint." The eight resources below cover both ends of the spectrum.

Free design system resources at a glance

|---|---|---|---|

All eight are free for commercial use under permissive licenses (MIT, Apache 2.0, or equivalent). Five of them ship production-ready React components you can install and use today. Three (Material, Polaris, Atlassian) double as reference systems worth studying even if you do not adopt them.

Component libraries you can actually install today

Reference systems like Material Design and Polaris are useful to study, but most teams need a library they can install in package.json and ship. These are the three free options that matter in 2026.

1. shadcn/ui: the React component library that changed the conversation

Best for: New React projects, teams that want full code ownership | Tech: React + Tailwind CSS + Radix UI primitives | License: MIT | Adoption: Dominant choice for new React projects in 2026

shadcn/ui is not a traditional component library. You do not install it as an npm dependency. Instead, you run npx shadcn-ui@latest add button and the component source code is copied directly into your project. You own the files. You edit them. You ship them. There is no library version to update, no dependency conflict to debug, no escape hatch you need that the library does not provide.

This sounds like a small technical detail. It is the single most important shift in component library philosophy since Material UI launched in 2014. Traditional component libraries hide their internals behind a contract — you call <Button variant="primary"> and the library decides what that means. shadcn/ui inverts this: the contract is the code, the code is in your repo, and your customizations are first-class.

What ships out of the box: 50+ components covering the standard set (Button, Input, Form, Dialog, Dropdown, Card, Tabs, Accordion, Toast, etc.), all built on Radix UI primitives for accessibility, all styled with Tailwind CSS, all in light and dark modes via CSS variables. The components are designed to be customized — the default styling is intentionally neutral so you can theme it to match any brand.

The 2026 reality check: Radix UI (the accessibility layer underneath shadcn/ui) announced in mid-2025 it was no longer being actively maintained. The community continues to use it (Radix still works fine) but teams planning for the long term should consider Base UI or React Aria as the underlying primitive layer instead. shadcn/ui itself is fine; the dependency situation under it has some uncertainty.

Where it falls short: not a "design system" in the full sense. No tokens, no documentation tooling, no contribution model out of the box. You get components and a strong opinion about how to style them. Everything else you build yourself. For complex tables, data grids, date range pickers, and charts, shadcn/ui ships starter examples but you will need to wire in TanStack Table, react-day-picker, or Recharts to get production-grade output.

Verdict: the default starting point for any new React project in 2026 that does not need a heavyweight reference system. Most teams that need "a component library" need shadcn/ui specifically.

2. Radix UI Primitives: the accessibility layer underneath the modern web

Best for: Custom designs, AAA accessibility requirements | Tech: React, unstyled primitives | License: MIT | Maintained by: WorkOS

Radix Primitives is the headless component library that powers shadcn/ui and a long list of other modern React projects. It ships unstyled, accessible UI primitives (Dialog, Dropdown, Popover, Tooltip, Slider, Toggle, and dozens more) built to WAI-ARIA standards with proper focus management, keyboard navigation, and screen reader support out of the box.

The value proposition: you get the hardest part of component design (accessibility) for free, while keeping full control over visual styling. Most teams that try to build their own modal component end up with a worse version of Radix's Dialog after two weeks of work. Starting from Radix saves you weeks of accessibility engineering on every project.

What's worth knowing in 2026: WorkOS acquired Radix in 2024 and the project's maintenance status became uncertain through 2025. The library still works and the existing components are stable, but new feature development has slowed. For teams starting new projects, the alternatives to consider are Base UI (the new primitive library from the same team that made Material UI) and React Aria from Adobe. Both ship similar accessibility primitives with active maintenance.

Where it falls short: maintenance uncertainty is real. The components themselves are battle-tested and production-stable, but if you build a new product on Radix in 2026, plan for a potential migration to Base UI or React Aria in 12-18 months.

Verdict: still useful for teams that already use shadcn/ui or have an existing Radix codebase. For new projects in 2026, evaluate Base UI and React Aria as the underlying primitive layer.

3. Ant Design: the enterprise-grade React library

Best for: B2B SaaS, enterprise dashboards, admin interfaces, data-dense products | Tech: React, Vue (Ant Design Vue) | License: MIT | Components: 60+ production-ready

Ant Design is one of the most widely used React component libraries in enterprise software, especially in B2B SaaS, admin interfaces, and data-dense products. Maintained by Ant Group (Alibaba's fintech arm), it ships a comprehensive component library with first-class support for dense interfaces: complex forms with validation, tables with sorting and filtering, hierarchical navigation, advanced date pickers, transfer components for bulk selection.

What separates Ant Design from shadcn/ui: it is opinionated. Ant has a distinct visual language and the components feel like Ant components even after customization. This is a feature if you are building an enterprise product where users expect dense efficient interfaces. It is a limitation if you are building a consumer product where you need strong visual differentiation.

The component breadth is also genuinely larger than shadcn/ui. If you need a Steps component for multi-step forms, a Tree component for hierarchical data, a Mentions component for @-mentions in text input, an Anchor component for in-page navigation, Ant Design ships these. shadcn/ui mostly does not.

Where it falls short: the visual language is dated relative to modern Tailwind / shadcn-style aesthetics. Bundle size is significant (Ant ships a lot of code). Customization beyond colors and minor adjustments fights the library's opinion. For consumer SaaS, marketing-led products, or design-system-first teams, Ant is the wrong starting point.

Verdict: the right pick for B2B SaaS, enterprise dashboards, and admin tools where component breadth matters more than visual differentiation.

Reference systems worth studying even if you do not adopt them

These are full design systems published by major tech companies. Most teams do not adopt them wholesale, but the documentation, token systems, and pattern libraries are gold-standard references for building your own.

4. Material Design 3 (Google): the most comprehensive reference system

Best for: Android-first products, cross-platform apps, accessibility benchmarks | Tech: Web, Android (Jetpack Compose), Flutter | License: Apache 2.0 | Components: 100+ documented

Material Design 3 (Material You) is Google's design system and the most comprehensive reference for design system thinking available for free. It covers layout, motion, color theory, typography, accessibility, interaction patterns, and platform-specific guidance for web, Android, and Flutter. The 2026 version emphasizes customization and expressiveness with dynamic color that adapts to user wallpaper and platform-level theme settings.

What's worth studying even if you do not adopt Material: the design token system (Material Theme Builder), the accessibility documentation (specifically the focus management and motion guidelines), the typography scale, and the elevation system. Material's elevation guidance is referenced across most modern design systems even when they do not look anything like Material.

Where it falls short: the visual language is opinionated and Android-first. Customizing Material to not look like Material is significant work. For non-Android products, Material is often more useful as a reference than as an adopted system.

Verdict: if you ship for Android or Flutter, adopt Material. If you ship for web, study Material's documentation and adopt the patterns selectively.

5. IBM Carbon: the enterprise reference standard

Best for: Enterprise products, data-heavy applications, accessibility-first teams | Tech: React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, Web Components | License: Apache 2.0 | Components: 70+ across frameworks

IBM Carbon is the open-source design system used across IBM's product portfolio and one of the strongest references for enterprise-grade design system thinking. The framework support is unusually broad — Carbon ships in React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, and Web Components, which makes it one of the few systems usable across heterogeneous engineering organizations.

What makes Carbon worth studying: the data visualization guidelines are best-in-class, including a dedicated charting library with accessibility-first defaults. The 2x grid system is a flexible spatial framework that handles complex enterprise UIs without forcing rigid column structures. The contribution model is well-documented, which is rare among published design systems.

Carbon's elevation system is also unusual: instead of using shadow weight to indicate hierarchy, Carbon uses color (surfaces get lighter as elevation increases in dark mode, alternating white/grey in light mode). The approach works well for dashboards and dense enterprise screens where shadow-heavy elevation creates visual noise.

Where it falls short: the visual language is conservative and signals "enterprise software" strongly. For consumer products, design-led startups, or any team that needs visual differentiation, Carbon's aesthetic is the wrong starting point.

Verdict: study Carbon for enterprise patterns, data visualization, and multi-framework architecture. Adopt it if you are building inside IBM's ecosystem or shipping for similar enterprise contexts.

6. Shopify Polaris: the reference for admin and e-commerce UI

Best for: E-commerce products, admin interfaces, merchant-facing tools | Tech: React | License: MIT | Components: 100+ with usage guidelines

Polaris is Shopify's design system, used across Shopify Admin, Shopify POS, and their partner ecosystem. Beyond the components, Polaris ships unusually detailed usage guidelines that cover when to use each component (not just how), content guidelines for interface copy, and accessibility documentation that goes deeper than most published systems.

What makes Polaris worth studying for non-Shopify teams: the content guidelines. Most design systems document the component behavior but leave copy decisions to individual designers. Polaris documents phrasing patterns, tone, capitalization, and error message structure at a level of detail that is rare and genuinely useful as a reference for any product.

Where it falls short: the visual language is unmistakably Shopify. Adopting Polaris outside the Shopify ecosystem requires significant visual override to stop the product from looking like a Shopify admin. The React-only implementation also limits adoption for multi-framework teams.

Verdict: study Polaris for content guidelines and admin UI patterns regardless of your stack. Adopt it if you are building tooling in the Shopify ecosystem.

7. Atlassian Design System: the semantic token reference

Best for: Multi-product orgs, teams learning semantic token architecture | Tech: React | License: Apache 2.0 | Components: 80+ with full token documentation

Atlassian's design system (used across Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, Trello) is the strongest public reference for semantic token architecture — the practice of naming tokens by their purpose ("color.background.selected") rather than their value ("blue-500"). The semantic naming system is what allows Jira to ship both a light and dark mode, a color-blind-accessible theme, and a high-contrast mode from the same component codebase.

What makes the Atlassian token documentation uniquely valuable: they publish the full semantic token map, the reasoning behind each token's name, and the mapping from semantic tokens to the base color palette. This is the reference most teams need when designing their own token layer.

Where it falls short: the Atlassian design language is specific to productivity and collaboration tools. The components feel at home in Jira but dated in consumer products. The React-only implementation and Atlassian-specific visual language limit broad adoption.

Verdict: study Atlassian's semantic token documentation before designing your own token layer. It is the best-published reference for this specific problem.

8. Microsoft Fluent 2: cross-platform consistency

Best for: Cross-platform products, Microsoft ecosystem, multi-surface consistency | Tech: React, React Native, iOS, Android | License: MIT | Components: 100+ with platform-specific guidance

Fluent 2 is Microsoft's design system for Microsoft 365, Windows, Teams, Azure, and their broader cross-platform ecosystem. The system's strength is cross-platform consistency: how do you maintain brand and interaction coherence when your product ships to web, Windows, iOS, Android, and macOS, while still respecting platform conventions on each surface?

Fluent's approach: shared semantic tokens that map to platform-specific component implementations. The button on iOS still feels like an iOS button, but the brand color, spacing scale, and typography hierarchy come from the same token set as the web. The motion guidelines are also worth studying: Fluent's motion is functional rather than decorative, with explicit guidance on duration, easing, and what motion communicates in interface hierarchy.

Where it falls short: Fluent feels like Microsoft. Adopting Fluent for a product that is not aligned with Microsoft's visual language requires significant customization. The cross-platform scope makes the documentation dense.

Verdict: if you are shipping to multiple platforms and need cross-platform consistency, Fluent 2 is the strongest published reference. Most teams shipping web-only will study Fluent but adopt simpler systems.

Design tokens and documentation: the often-missing layer

A design system is more than components. The tokens that define color, spacing, typography, and motion, plus the documentation that turns the system into something teams can actually adopt, are what separate a component library from a design system. These free tools cover the gap.

Design Tokens Community Group (DTCG) specification

What it is: The W3C specification for portable design tokens | License: Open standard | Cost: Free

The DTCG format is the emerging standard for design tokens. Instead of every design tool defining its own token format (Figma's variables, Adobe's tokens, Sketch's color variables), DTCG defines a common JSON schema that any tool can import or export. Penpot ships native DTCG support as of early 2026. Figma's Token Studio plugin supports DTCG import/export. Style Dictionary (Amazon's open-source token transformation tool) reads DTCG natively.

The practical value: tokens become portable. You define your color palette in DTCG JSON, import it into Penpot for design, export it via Style Dictionary to CSS variables for engineering, and apply the same tokens across native iOS and Android builds. The format is the integration layer, not any single tool.

Style Dictionary (Amazon)

What it is: Open-source token transformation tool | License: Apache 2.0 | Cost: Free

Style Dictionary takes a single source of truth for design tokens (typically a DTCG JSON file) and transforms it into platform-specific outputs: CSS variables, Sass variables, JavaScript constants, iOS Swift constants, Android XML resources, Flutter Dart constants, and more. The tool is the de facto standard for any team running a multi-platform design system.

For teams building a design system from scratch, Style Dictionary is what makes the token layer work across web, iOS, Android, and any other platform. Without it, you maintain tokens manually in each codebase and they drift.

Storybook

What it is: Open-source component documentation tool | License: MIT | Cost: Free

Storybook is the de facto standard for documenting React, Vue, Angular, and Svelte components. You write a "story" for each component and Storybook generates an interactive documentation site that lets designers and developers preview every variant, prop combination, and state. Most production component libraries (including parts of shadcn/ui's ecosystem) ship Storybook documentation.

For teams building a design system, Storybook is the documentation layer. Components live in code, stories live alongside them, and the rendered documentation is a static site you can host anywhere.

zeroheight (free tier)

What it is: Hosted design system documentation platform | License: Proprietary, free tier available | Cost: Free for small teams

zeroheight is a hosted documentation platform specifically built for design systems. It integrates with Figma to sync components and tokens, lets teams document usage guidelines alongside the visual components, and acts as a "single source of truth" hub that connects design and engineering. The free tier covers small teams (typically up to 5 editors) which is enough for most startup-stage design systems.

For teams where Storybook is too engineering-focused and a Notion page is too informal, zeroheight is the middle path.

**Browse more design system resources on Mantlr →**

How to actually pick a stack in 2026

Three honest paths based on what you are trying to build:

If you are a 2-10 person startup shipping a single React product: install shadcn/ui. Use Style Dictionary if you need cross-platform tokens (you probably do not yet). Document component usage in a Notion page or a README until you outgrow it. Skip zeroheight and Storybook until you have 3+ designers or 5+ engineers. You do not need a design system; you need a component library and the discipline to use it consistently.

If you are a 10-50 person product team with multiple products or shipping cross-platform: install shadcn/ui or Ant Design depending on your visual aesthetic. Define a token system using DTCG format (study Atlassian's semantic naming first). Set up Style Dictionary to transform tokens into your platform outputs. Add Storybook for component documentation. Consider zeroheight for usage guidelines that designers will actually read. Study Material 3 or Carbon as a reference for what mature looks like, but do not adopt them wholesale.

If you are an enterprise team with 50+ designers or regulated requirements: evaluate adopting Carbon (open source, multi-framework, accessibility-first) or Fluent 2 (cross-platform consistency) instead of building from scratch. The 12-18 months you would spend building your own system are rarely worth the differentiation.

Avoid the common mistake of jumping to "we need a full design system" when you actually need a component library plus naming discipline. The hardest part of a design system is not the components or the tokens — it is the governance, contribution model, and team culture around using the system consistently. None of the resources above will solve that for you.

What changed in 2025-2026 that matters

Three shifts in the design system landscape worth understanding because most listicles published before mid-2025 miss them:

shadcn/ui replaced "install a component library" as the default for new React projects. The shift from npm-installed dependencies to copy-paste source code that you own is a permanent change to how teams build. Material UI, Chakra UI, Mantine, and the rest of the traditional libraries still exist and still work, but new projects increasingly start with shadcn/ui.

Design tokens went from a Figma plugin feature to a native first-party feature. Penpot ships native DTCG support. Figma's variables system has matured. The W3C DTCG specification is stable. Teams building tokens in 2026 should commit to DTCG format from the start, not Figma's proprietary token format.

AI agents are starting to consume design systems directly. Penpot's MCP server (launched January 2026) lets Claude and Cursor read design files and apply tokens consistently. Figma added MCP support. The skill of organizing a design system for AI consumption (clear semantic naming, machine-readable token files, well-structured component metadata) is becoming a competitive advantage that did not exist a year ago.

Frequently asked questions

What are the best free design system resources for startups in 2026?

For startups shipping a React product, the canonical 2026 stack is shadcn/ui for components, the W3C DTCG specification for tokens, Style Dictionary for transforming tokens across platforms, and Storybook for documentation. This stack is fully free, MIT/Apache licensed for commercial use, and covers the 80% of design system needs that startup-stage teams have. Reference systems like Material Design 3, IBM Carbon, and Atlassian Design System are useful to study for token naming and pattern guidance but do not need to be adopted.

What is the difference between a design system and a component library?

A component library is a set of reusable UI pieces (buttons, forms, modals). A design system is a component library plus design tokens, usage guidelines, governance rules, documentation, and a contribution model. Most small teams need a component library and not a full design system. The threshold where a design system becomes necessary is usually 3+ products, 10+ designers, or cross-team coordination requirements.

Is shadcn/ui really free for commercial use?

Yes. shadcn/ui is licensed under MIT, which allows free use in commercial products including paid SaaS, client work, and revenue-generating sites. The components are copied directly into your project (not installed as a dependency), so once you have the code, you own it permanently with no license expiration or seat limits. The same applies to Radix UI Primitives, which shadcn/ui uses underneath.

What is the best free design system for enterprise products?

IBM Carbon is the strongest open-source design system for enterprise products in 2026, with framework support across React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, and Web Components, plus best-in-class data visualization guidelines and accessibility-first defaults. Microsoft Fluent 2 is the alternative for teams needing cross-platform consistency across web, desktop, and mobile. Both are free under permissive licenses and used in production at companies like IBM, Microsoft, and across the enterprise software ecosystem.

Do I need a paid plugin for design tokens in 2026?

No. The W3C Design Tokens Community Group specification is open and free, Penpot ships native DTCG support, and Style Dictionary handles token transformation across platforms at no cost. The Token Studio Figma plugin (paid at $99/user/year for the full version) is useful if your team is committed to Figma and wants the polished plugin UX, but it is no longer required infrastructure. Teams starting fresh in 2026 should commit to DTCG format from the start.

Is Radix UI still safe to use in 2026?

The components are stable and production-ready, but Radix UI's maintenance status became uncertain after WorkOS acquired the project in 2024 and active development slowed through 2025. For existing projects, Radix continues to work fine. For new projects, evaluate Base UI (from the Material UI team) or React Aria (from Adobe) as the underlying accessibility primitive layer. Both are actively maintained alternatives with similar component coverage.

What is the best free documentation tool for a design system?

For component documentation, Storybook is the de facto standard, MIT licensed, and free for all team sizes. For broader system documentation that includes usage guidelines, design principles, and content patterns, zeroheight offers a free tier for small teams. For startup-stage teams, a well-structured Notion page or GitBook is often sufficient until the system grows large enough to justify a dedicated tool.

How do I choose between shadcn/ui and Ant Design?

Choose shadcn/ui if you are building a consumer-facing product, design-led SaaS, or any product where visual differentiation matters. Choose Ant Design if you are building a B2B SaaS, enterprise dashboard, admin interface, or data-dense product where component breadth and dense interface patterns matter more than visual differentiation. shadcn/ui requires more customization upfront but produces more differentiated final products. Ant Design ships faster but produces products that look like Ant products.

Where to go from here

Pick one resource from the list and commit to using it for the next month. Most design system projects fail because teams research endlessly without adopting anything. Adopt shadcn/ui if you are starting a React project. Study Atlassian's tokens before you design your own. Set up Style Dictionary if you ship cross-platform. Add Storybook when documentation actually slows you down.

The hardest part of a design system is the discipline to use it consistently, not the tools you adopt. The free stack above covers what most teams need; the discipline is on you.

Discovering more design system resources on Mantlr

Mantlr tracks every design system, component library, and token tool worth knowing — framework support, license, and use case all in one place:

**Design Systems on Mantlr**: every open-source design system reviewed by the Mantlr team, sortable by framework and use case.
**shadcn/ui on Mantlr**: component coverage, theme variations, and recommended starter templates for new React projects.
**Material Design 3 on Mantlr**: the official kit, community Penpot port, and the Figma file index.
**Free Penpot Templates for UI Design in 2026**: UI kits and templates that pair well with the design systems above.
**Free AI Design Tools for UI Designers in 2026**: AI-driven design tools that compound with a solid system foundation.

Stop reinventing components every sprint. Mantlr curates 500+ design resources — component libraries, design systems, UI kits, and tools — hand-picked and verified so you can ship faster.

Browse the Mantlr Directory →

Sources and methodology

Research conducted May 2026. Component library adoption and 2025-2026 trend data verified against Untitled UI's "14 Best React UI Component Libraries in 2026" (untitledui.com/blog/react-component-libraries, January 2026) and DesignRevision's "Best React Component Libraries 2026" (designrevision.com, February 2026). shadcn/ui details and Radix UI maintenance status from Dev.to coverage including "ShadCN UI in 2026: Why I Stopped Installing Component Libraries" (April 2026) and shadcn/ui's official documentation (shadcn.io). Design system reference details verified against UXPin's "13 Best Design System Examples to Learn From in 2026" (uxpin.com/studio/blog/best-design-system-examples, May 2026), designsystems.surf's "11 Best Design Systems Examples in 2026" (February 2026), and Adham Dannaway's design system analysis (adhamdannaway.com/blog, January 2026). Atlassian Design System token architecture from atlassian.design official documentation (retrieved May 2026). Material Design 3 details from material.io and Figma's "12 Design System Examples" resource library (figma.com/resource-library/design-system-examples, retrieved May 2026). DTCG specification and Penpot native token support details from Penpot's official MCP and design tokens documentation (help.penpot.app, retrieved May 2026). Style Dictionary and Storybook details from their respective official documentation (amzn.github.io/style-dictionary and storybook.js.org, retrieved May 2026).

About Mantlr

Mantlr is a hand-picked directory of design tools, UI kits, templates, and resources for working designers and developers. Every resource is reviewed before listing. We publish weekly guides on the tools designers actually use to ship.

Browse the full Mantlr directory →

Free Design System Resources Every Team Needs in 2026